Dude, I didn’t bring it up in my original post because it wasn’t a complaint I had. I was just pointing out that lurnn’s response to something I said outside of my suggestion was bad. Nowhere here was I saying “I feel disadvantaged blah blah blah” because it’s something that’s only relevant to me. It’s kind of disconcerting that when I’m just pointing out as a small part of my response to lurnn that he had a detail off, that you’ve taken it as me trying to say the results of the tournament are invalid and that it was unfair.View attachment 2108
Suppose it wasn't any issue unless you won right?
I love feedback for this event as it'll help the next one run smoother and overall a better experience for players despite this the fact you didn't raise that you felt at all disadvantaged in the 6 days before the event nor did you complain about the pots in any of the events you won but the second you lost you claim you're at a disadvantage comes across very poor taste and questions if its feedback to improve the event or improve your chances of winning.
furthermore: if you reply that I’ve continued talking about it and therefore cannot only see it as a small detail, then you’re saying I have no choice other than to not respond to lurnn or spalw when they make an insult to me that I think is based on a flawed premise. Lurnn’s entire response was antagonistic in nature and he’s received no backlash. If I don’t respond to it, then it looks like a concession.
it’s just overall offputting that I’m trying to be objective, lurnn essentially says I’m only pushing suggestions for self-benefit even though I’ve had multiple people who aren’t me come to agree, and then I get dogpiled for defending my motivations. At this point, it literally doesn’t matter whether I want to win or not, your job as a member of the staff team is to determine whether you think I have presented good ideas.
Last edited: