After me being banned on the word of a lower level staff I think the staff should have a different system for banning.
I think after banning someone the lower level staff shouldn't be able to ban an innocent player simply based on their merit, because there is no way for them to be punished for something simply because "the staff saw it" and the innocent player has no way to defend them self. Unless it is a high level staff member the staff should have to have shadow play and before the ban someone be required to save it and keep it for a day to reply to any ban appeal so that high level staff can review the evidence and say if it actually is or isn't hacks.
I think this system could solve a lot of innocent people from being word just because of the merit of low level staff and it could also prevent corruption.
I think after banning someone the lower level staff shouldn't be able to ban an innocent player simply based on their merit, because there is no way for them to be punished for something simply because "the staff saw it" and the innocent player has no way to defend them self. Unless it is a high level staff member the staff should have to have shadow play and before the ban someone be required to save it and keep it for a day to reply to any ban appeal so that high level staff can review the evidence and say if it actually is or isn't hacks.
I think this system could solve a lot of innocent people from being word just because of the merit of low level staff and it could also prevent corruption.